chore: upgrade hono to 4.11.3

[BarryThePenguin]

No description provided.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 7a6f00f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[BarryThePenguin]

It looks like there was a change in either v4.11.2 or v4.11.3 that caused the type of the validator function to change 🤔

[yusukebe]

Yes. The validator type was changed to make the types correct. The type definition became complex. So using @ts-expect-error makes sense.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.24%. Comparing base (5acf969) to head (7a6f00f).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1668   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.24%   92.24%           
=======================================
  Files         111      111           
  Lines        3661     3661           
  Branches      967      956   -11     
=======================================
  Hits         3377     3377           
  Misses        250      250           
  Partials       34       34           

Flag	Coverage Δ
ajv-validator	100.00% <ø> (ø)
arktype-validator	93.54% <ø> (ø)
auth-js	98.57% <ø> (ø)
bun-compress	18.91% <ø> (ø)
capnweb	60.71% <ø> (ø)
casbin	86.48% <ø> (ø)
class-validator	95.00% <ø> (ø)
clerk-auth	88.46% <ø> (ø)
cloudflare-access	100.00% <ø> (ø)
conform-validator	96.15% <ø> (ø)
effect-validator	100.00% <ø> (ø)
esbuild-transpiler	100.00% <ø> (ø)
event-emitter	100.00% <ø> (ø)
firebase-auth	96.61% <ø> (ø)
graphql-server	92.15% <ø> (ø)
hello	100.00% <ø> (ø)
mcp	90.60% <ø> (ø)
medley-router	90.90% <ø> (ø)
node-ws	80.68% <ø> (ø)
oauth-providers	92.48% <ø> (ø)
oidc-auth	96.44% <ø> (ø)
otel	93.65% <ø> (ø)
prometheus	90.24% <ø> (ø)
react-renderer	88.88% <ø> (ø)
sentry	77.27% <ø> (ø)
session	98.91% <ø> (ø)
standard-validator	96.10% <ø> (ø)
stytch-auth	100.00% <ø> (ø)
swagger-editor	73.68% <ø> (ø)
swagger-ui	95.00% <ø> (ø)
trpc-server	69.56% <ø> (ø)
tsyringe	100.00% <ø> (ø)
typebox-validator	100.00% <ø> (ø)
typedriver-validator	100.00% <ø> (ø)
typia-validator	87.75% <ø> (ø)
ua-blocker	90.00% <ø> (ø)
valibot-validator	84.61% <ø> (ø)
zod-openapi	93.79% <ø> (ø)
zod-validator	91.30% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[MathurAditya724]

Can we integrate catalogs? As described here - https://yarnpkg.com/features/catalogs

Happy to create a seperate PR for this

[BarryThePenguin]

Can we integrate catalogs? As described here - https://yarnpkg.com/features/catalogs

Happy to create a seperate PR for this

Is there a specific problem you want to solve? Does dependabot support yarn catalogs?

Adopting catalogs makes sense, just wondering if there's anything we should be aware of. For example, switching to bun if it becomes feasible

[yusukebe]

LGTM!

[yusukebe]

Hey @BarryThePenguin Happy New Year!

Looks good to me. Thank you!

[BarryThePenguin]

🎆 Happy New Year! 🥳