Conversation
… alpha value - add maps as other choices of Imagetype
2c5dc78 to
444f816
Compare
|
@naegelejd and @ahsanjav as the user of this type I will move the maps to the generic NDarray field in mrd_intermediate.yml and how about we keep the rgb-a image type as 6th ImageType from ISMRMRD? https://ismrmrd.readthedocs.io/en/latest/mrd_image_data.html#image-types Also, any comments on ArrayTypes to include, aside from the maps above, will be appreciated |
… with ImageType * In our past discussion, we proposed extending ImageType to describe maps (B0, phase, T1-weighted, etc.). Instead, the map s are stored as NDArray in mrd_intermediate.yml * mrd_intermediate.yml specifies arbitrary dimension array with a header for description, ArrayType as enumerator for labeling maps, and ArrayDimension as vector to describe the dimension of the arbitrary array. * ndarray of each datatypes are in mrd_protocol.yml as streamable item
* Restore rgba ImageType as 6th enum from ISMRMRD format in mrd_image.yml
|
Hi @naegelejd, question about the ISMRMRD format, I am trying to incorporate If the ISMRMRD ended up removing the rgb type, I can just add this as a feature only available in MRD2.0 not in ISMRMRD, in the converter scripts. |
|
@kekeke21 , Yes, just treat it as an MRD 2 feature. I'm aware of the discrepancy between that documentation page and the actual ISMRMD implementation. I have a hunch as to why there is a discrepancy, but, fundamentally, |
Hi ISMRMRD/MRD community, we would like to hear your inputs about adding an ImageType to describe variations of reconstructed images used in MRI. Mentioning members who have been at the meeting but open to others @hansenms @naegelejd @johnstairs @rajramasawmy @ahsanjav
Currently, the MRD format has
ImageTypefield specified as below to serve as the reconstructed image description. However, it is also crucial to save the reconstruction process intermediate values in the image field to associate with reconstructed images #45This suggestion is to add RGBA, bitmaps, and other maps listed below to represent interpretation maps derived from reconstructed images. We would like to hear thoughts and ideas on what to add as a choice of
ImageTypefor each use cases, such as g-factor map for accelerated imaging.Our current idea is below where RGB was originally in ISMRMRD format and this adds an alpha value to the channel dimension for overlay purpose, or there might be a reason to remove when transitioning from ISMRMRD to MRD?
We also considered other options to achieve the similar goal.
ImageMetafield. This can add ambiguity and inconsistent notation, hence we chose enumerator to make an explicit labeling.ImageTypeto separate data types (e.g. real, complex) and interpretation (T1 maps, etc.). However, the generic type ofImageData<T>already specifies the data type. We could also refine the existing list to only describe the semantic meaning of the images.