Skip to content

Value with unit tests#40

Draft
rimi-itk wants to merge 3 commits intofeature/value-and-unit-fieldfrom
feature/value-and-unit-field-test
Draft

Value with unit tests#40
rimi-itk wants to merge 3 commits intofeature/value-and-unit-fieldfrom
feature/value-and-unit-field-test

Conversation

@rimi-itk
Copy link
Contributor

@rimi-itk rimi-itk commented Dec 19, 2024

Link to ticket

Please add a link to the ticket being addressed by this change.

Description

Builds on #39 and refactors code to make it testable. And adds tests.

Checklist

  • My code is covered by test cases.
  • My code passes our test (all our tests).
  • My code passes our static analysis suite.
  • My code passes our continuous integration process.

If your code does not pass all the requirements on the checklist you have to add a comment explaining why this change
should be exempt from the list.

Additional comments or questions

If you have any further comments or questions for the reviewer please add them here.

@rimi-itk rimi-itk force-pushed the feature/value-and-unit-field-test branch from d8ae257 to 9ae9e4b Compare December 19, 2024 09:06
@rimi-itk rimi-itk force-pushed the feature/value-and-unit-field-test branch from 9ae9e4b to da3e5da Compare December 19, 2024 09:10
@rimi-itk rimi-itk changed the title feature/value and unit field test Value with unit tests Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant