fix: remove redundant log messages in dconfig-trigger-handler

[18202781743]

1. Removed unnecessary debug log "Found newer config file" that was
   cluttering logs
2. Removed redundant "Processing trigger path" log that provided little
   value
3. These logs were deemed too verbose for production use
4. Maintains core functionality while cleaning up log output

fix: 移除 dconfig-trigger-handler 中的冗余日志消息

1. 移除了不必要的调试日志"Found newer config file"，这些日志使日志文件变
   得杂乱
2. 移除了冗余的"Processing trigger path"日志，这些日志提供的价值有限
3. 这些日志被认为在生产环境中过于冗长
4. 在清理日志输出的同时保持了核心功能

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

• Remove redundant 'Found newer config file' and 'Processing trigger path' debug logs from the dconfig-trigger-handler to reduce log clutter.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

Eliminates two redundant debug log statements from dconfig-trigger-handler to reduce verbosity in production without affecting core logic.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Cleaned up verbose debug logs	Removed debug log ‘Found newer config file’ Removed redundant ‘Processing trigger path’ log	dconfig-center/dde-dconfig-daemon/scripts/dconfig-trigger-handler

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @18202781743 - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[deepin-ci-robot]

deepin pr auto review

代码审查意见：

1. 日志记录：

   • 在process_newer_files_in_directory函数中，移除了log_info "Found newer config file: $config_file"的日志记录，这可能会影响调试和问题追踪。如果这个日志记录不是必要的，应该明确说明为什么移除它，否则应该恢复。

2. 代码可读性：

   • 在process_trigger_paths函数中，移除了log_info "Processing trigger path: $trigger_path"的日志记录，这可能会影响对函数执行流程的理解。如果这个日志记录不是必要的，应该明确说明为什么移除它，否则应该恢复。

3. 变量命名：

   • processed_count变量在两个函数中都有使用，但只在process_newer_files_in_directory函数中进行了初始化。如果这个变量在process_trigger_paths函数中也需要使用，应该在函数开始时进行初始化。

4. 代码重复：

   • is_config_file函数的调用在两个函数中都有，可以考虑将其提取到一个公共函数中，以减少代码重复。

5. 错误处理：

   • 在call_dbus_update函数调用后没有错误处理，如果该函数失败，应该有相应的错误处理逻辑。

6. 安全性：

   • 没有对输入的trigger_path进行任何形式的验证或清理，如果trigger_path来自不可信的源，可能会导致安全问题，如路径遍历攻击。

7. 性能：

   • 如果process_newer_files_in_directory函数中的while循环处理大量文件，可以考虑使用并行处理来提高性能。

综上所述，建议在移除日志记录之前，确认这些日志记录是否真的不再需要，并且考虑将一些重复的代码提取到公共函数中，以提高代码的可维护性和可读性。同时，对于安全性、错误处理和性能等方面的问题，也需要进行相应的改进。

[deepin-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 18202781743, mhduiy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• debian/deepin/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment