Skip to content

chore: update changelog to 1.0.2#5

Open
mhduiy wants to merge 1 commit intolinuxdeepin:masterfrom
mhduiy:dev-changelog-1.0.2
Open

chore: update changelog to 1.0.2#5
mhduiy wants to merge 1 commit intolinuxdeepin:masterfrom
mhduiy:dev-changelog-1.0.2

Conversation

@mhduiy
Copy link
Contributor

@mhduiy mhduiy commented Feb 5, 2026

更新说明

自动更新 changelog 到版本 1.0.2

变更内容

  • 更新 debian/changelog

版本信息

  • 新版本: 1.0.2
  • 目标分支: master

Summary by Sourcery

Chores:

  • Refresh debian/changelog to reflect version 1.0.2 targeting master.

update changelog to 1.0.2

Log: update changelog to 1.0.2
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mhduiy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Feb 5, 2026

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Update Debian package changelog metadata to reflect new release version 1.0.2 targeting master.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Refresh Debian changelog entry for the 1.0.2 release.
  • Adjust package version metadata to 1.0.2 in the changelog header/entry.
  • Update associated changelog text to describe the 1.0.2 release.
  • Ensure the latest changelog stanza is positioned correctly at the top for Debian tooling.
debian/changelog

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

这段 debian/changelog 的 diff 内容展示了一个版本从 1.0.1 到 1.0.2 的变更记录。经过审查,我发现其中存在一些逻辑错误、格式规范问题以及潜在的安全隐患

以下是详细的审查意见和改进建议:

1. 语法逻辑与格式规范

  • 时间逻辑错误(严重)

    • 问题:新版本(1.0.2)的日期是 Thu, 05 Feb 2026,而旧版本(1.0.1)的日期是 Fri, 11 Jan 2025。虽然 changelog 通常是按时间倒序排列的,但这里的年份设定为 2026 年,除非这是为了未来的特定发布计划,否则极有可能是输入错误(可能本意是 2024 或 2025)。
    • 建议:请核实并修正日期年份,确保与实际发布时间一致。
  • 重复的日志条目

    • 问题:在 zhangkun 的部分,* refactor: 调整control 连续出现了两次。
    • 建议:删除重复的条目,保持日志整洁。
  • 维护者变更与发行版状态

    • 问题:版本从 UNRELEASED 变更为 unstable,这是正确的发布流程。但维护者从 echengqi 变更为 zhangkun。这通常意味着打包权责的转移。如果只是临时修改,通常不需要更改最下方的维护者签名行,除非这是新的维护者发布的新版本。
    • 建议:确认是否需要变更维护者。如果是多人协作,通常由最后发布的人签名,但要注意 debian/control 中的 Maintainer 字段是否也需要同步更新。
  • 版本号回退风险

    • 问题:日志中有一行 chore: Bump version to 1.0.1。当前头部版本是 1.0.2。如果在 1.0.2 的变更记录里包含将版本降级到 1.0.1 的记录,会导致版本号混乱。
    • 建议:删除 chore: Bump version to 1.0.1 这一行。Changelog 记录的是当前版本(1.0.2)所做的更改,不应该包含"将版本号改为旧版本"的操作。

2. 代码质量

  • 日志信息语言不统一

    • 问题:日志中混用了英文(如 fix(daemon):, chore:)和中文(如 调整control)。
    • 建议:建议统一使用英文或统一使用中文,以提高日志的可读性和专业性。如果是国际化项目,推荐使用英文。
  • Commit Message 格式

    • 问题:使用了 fix(daemon): 这种类似 Conventional Commits 的格式,这很好。但 refactor: 调整control 比较模糊。
    • 建议:具体说明 control 做了什么调整(例如:refactor(control): update build dependencies),以便于后续追踪变更原因。

3. 代码安全

  • 签名验证
    • 观察:Diff 中显示的是明文签名 -- zhangkun <zhangkun2@uniontech.com>
    • 建议:虽然这不是语法错误,但在构建发布包时,建议使用 GPG 签名对包进行签名,以确保包的完整性和来源可信度。

4. 改进后的示例

假设修正了年份、删除了重复条目、统一了语言并理顺了版本逻辑,建议的修改如下:

--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
-dde-dialog (1.0.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+dde-dialog (1.0.2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
+  [ zhangkun ]
+  * fix(daemon): dialog-agent displays "null" in pop-up content
+  * refactor(control): update dependencies and package description
   * refactor: 调整control.
 
- -- echengqi <echengqi@uniontech.org>  Fri, 11 Jan 2025 13:40:36 +0800
+ -- zhangkun <zhangkun2@uniontech.com>  Thu, 05 Feb 2025 19:51:43 +0800
 
 dde-dialog (1.0.0) unstable; urgency=medium

主要变更点说明:

  1. 修正日期为 2025 年(假设当前是 2025 年)。
  2. 删除了 Bump version to 1.0.1 的无效记录。
  3. 删除了重复的 refactor 行。
  4. refactor: 调整control 改为更具体的描述(示例),或者至少保留一个。
  5. 保留了 fix(daemon) 这条有价值的 Bug 修复记录。

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants