Skip to content

fix: [scale] Adjust the default zoom mode to 'FitToPageWidthMode'.#213

Merged
deepin-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intolinuxdeepin:masterfrom
LiHua000:master
Nov 24, 2025
Merged

fix: [scale] Adjust the default zoom mode to 'FitToPageWidthMode'.#213
deepin-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intolinuxdeepin:masterfrom
LiHua000:master

Conversation

@LiHua000
Copy link
Contributor

-- Adjust the default zoom mode to ​​"FitToPageWidthMode"​​.

Log: fix issue
Bug: https://pms.uniontech.com/bug-view-322581.html

-- Adjust the default zoom mode to ​​"FitToPageWidthMode"​​.

Log: fix issue
Bug: https://pms.uniontech.com/bug-view-322581.html
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

我来分析一下这个代码变更:

  1. 语法逻辑:
  • 这段代码修改了 SheetOperation 结构体中 scaleMode 成员的默认值
  • 从 Dr::FitToPageWorHMode 改为 Dr::FitToPageWidthMode
  • 语法上完全正确,没有问题
  1. 代码质量:
  • 修改是合理的,因为 FitToPageWorHMode 这个命名看起来有拼写错误(WorH)
  • 新的命名 FitToPageWidthMode 更加清晰和准确
  • 这提高了代码的可读性和可维护性
  1. 代码性能:
  • 这个修改只涉及一个枚举值的变更,不会对性能产生任何影响
  • 在编译时就已经确定了值,运行时没有额外开销
  1. 代码安全:
  • 这个修改是安全的,因为:
    • 只是改变了默认值,没有改变数据结构
    • 新的枚举值应该是合法的(从命名来看)
    • 不会导致内存安全问题

改进建议:

  1. 建议检查所有使用 FitToPageWorHMode 的地方,确保它们都被正确更新为 FitToPageWidthMode
  2. 如果 FitToPageWorHMode 已经不再使用,建议从枚举定义中删除它,避免混淆
  3. 可以考虑添加注释说明这个默认值的选择原因
  4. 建议在代码审查时确认这个改动不会影响现有的用户设置或配置文件兼容性

总的来说,这是一个很好的改进,提高了代码的可读性和准确性。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: LiHua000, lzwind

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@LiHua000
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@deepin-bot deepin-bot bot merged commit 878c076 into linuxdeepin:master Nov 24, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants