Skip to content

chore: bump version to 1.0.17#73

Merged
mhduiy merged 1 commit intolinuxdeepin:masterfrom
robertkill:dev-changelog
Oct 30, 2025
Merged

chore: bump version to 1.0.17#73
mhduiy merged 1 commit intolinuxdeepin:masterfrom
robertkill:dev-changelog

Conversation

@robertkill
Copy link
Contributor

update changelog to 1.0.17

update changelog to 1.0.17
@robertkill robertkill requested a review from mhduiy October 30, 2025 12:17
@github-actions
Copy link

TAG Bot

TAG: 1.0.17
EXISTED: no
DISTRIBUTION: unstable

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

这是一个 Debian 包的变更日志(changelog)diff,我来为你分析一下:

  1. 格式规范:
  • 遵循了 Debian changelog 的标准格式
  • 版本号、发行版、紧急程度都符合规范
  • 维护者信息和日期格式正确
  • 变更条目使用了合适的缩进
  1. 内容分析:
  • 版本从 1.0.16 升级到 1.0.17
  • 包含两个修复性变更:
    • 使用 QLibrary 加载和检查库版本
    • 修复 ServiceManager 中错误的槽函数名
  1. 改进建议:
  • 变更描述可以更具体一些:
    • 对于第一个修复,可以说明为什么要使用 QLibrary,解决了什么问题
    • 对于第二个修复,可以说明具体的错误是什么,以及修复后的效果

建议的改进格式:

deepin-service-manager (1.0.17) unstable; urgency=medium

  * fix: use QLibrary to load and check library version
    - 解决了动态库加载时的版本检查问题,提高了兼容性
  * fix: incorrect slot name in ServiceManager
    - 修复了服务管理器中信号槽连接错误,确保服务状态正确更新

 -- lvpeilong <lvpeilong@uniontech.com>  Thu, 30 Oct 2025 20:17:16 +0800
  1. 安全性考虑:
  • 使用 QLibrary 进行动态库加载是一个好的实践,因为它提供了更安全的库加载机制
  • 修复信号槽名称错误可以避免潜在的运行时错误

总体来说,这个变更日志符合规范,但可以在描述的详细程度上做得更好,以便其他开发者更好地理解变更的具体内容和影响。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BLumia, robertkill

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mhduiy mhduiy merged commit 0813126 into linuxdeepin:master Oct 30, 2025
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants