Draft
Conversation
Shared implementation logic in OTFI Ibex, Otbn, and Crypto is moved in a base class named `OTFI`.
aewag
force-pushed
the
generalize-otfi
branch
2 times, most recently
from
37eac54 to
f1a5da5
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@nasahlpa Draft how OTFI framework could be generalized (partly tested). WDYT?
It allows to reuse code between the different IPs and tests. A new test is added if it is appended to the
TESTSlist. If the command cannot be derived from the testname it has to be explicitly specified.