-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Fix source insertion metadata alignment #25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @iamarcel, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a critical issue where the metadata used for post-processing newly inserted source rows could become misaligned with their original input data. By implementing a robust lookup mechanism, the changes ensure that each inserted source row is correctly associated with its corresponding initial input, thereby preventing incorrect payload updates and maintaining data integrity during the source creation process. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly addresses a bug where source metadata could be misaligned after bulk insertion with conflicts. By creating a lookup map from the original inputs, you ensure that the post-processing logic correctly associates the inserted database rows with their corresponding input data. This is a solid fix.
I have one suggestion to make the implementation more robust by improving how the lookup key is generated to prevent potential collisions.
| const makeLookupKey = ( | ||
| userId: string, | ||
| type: SourceType, | ||
| externalId: string, | ||
| ) => `${userId}:${type}:${externalId}`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current method of creating a lookup key by concatenating userId, type, and externalId with a colon separator is not robust. If userId or externalId were to contain a colon, it could lead to key collisions and incorrect data association. For example, userId: 'user:conversation', type: 'document', externalId: 'ext1' would produce the same key as userId: 'user', type: 'conversation', externalId: 'document:ext1'. This would cause one of the inputs to be overwritten in the lookup map, and could lead to incorrect metadata being associated with an inserted source.
A safer approach is to use a method that guarantees uniqueness, such as JSON stringifying an array of the key components. This will prevent any potential key collisions.
| const makeLookupKey = ( | |
| userId: string, | |
| type: SourceType, | |
| externalId: string, | |
| ) => `${userId}:${type}:${externalId}`; | |
| const makeLookupKey = ( | |
| userId: string, | |
| type: SourceType, | |
| externalId: string, | |
| ) => JSON.stringify([userId, type, externalId]); |
Summary
Testing
pnpm linthttps://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68cf96b84730832f9ee1be18cace2dc6