Skip to content

Rotation of 3 points in 3D implemented and covered by tests.#35

Open
PolarNick239 wants to merge 3 commits intomcquay239:masterfrom
PolarNick239:Rotation3DPoints
Open

Rotation of 3 points in 3D implemented and covered by tests.#35
PolarNick239 wants to merge 3 commits intomcquay239:masterfrom
PolarNick239:Rotation3DPoints

Conversation

@PolarNick239
Copy link

Only interval and rational calculation implemented correctly.
Double arithmetic calculation implemented WRONG! (test will fail, if you will uncomment double-arithmetic optimisation) It seems, that I was wrong in eps calcultaion. My calculations - https://www.dropbox.com/s/6ntftgxuld53clz/19_3.jpeg?dl=0
But orientation of 3D points is usable - but it can be a bit slow (interval and rational arithmetic driven).

Only interval and rational calculation implemented correctly.
Double arithmetic calculation implemented WRONG! (test will fail, if you will uncomment double-arithmetic optimisation) It seems, that I was wrong in eps calcultaion. My calculations - https://www.dropbox.com/s/6ntftgxuld53clz/19_3.jpeg?dl=0
But orientation of 3D points is usable - but it can be a bit slow (interval and rational arithmetic driven).
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Антон вам еще не рассказал, почему 3 пробела хорошо, а 4 плохо?)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Нет :)
Предположение - чтобы не было споров?
Или у четырех есть фатальный недостаток?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Есть. Четыре пробела слишком большой отступ, а два слишком маленький :) Надо поправить на три.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ну елки-палки. Это какой-то мрак. Стандарты ведь есть, IDE ведь должны бы быть (а с этого года и для плюсов). Сейчас испорчу на три.

@PolarNick239
Copy link
Author

В чем у меня бага в рассчете доверительного диапазона? (мои тесты падают, если этап на чистых double включить)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments