Skip to content

Conversation

@Nyholm
Copy link
Contributor

@Nyholm Nyholm commented Dec 27, 2025

Motivation and Context

This follow up from #195 by properly adding the parameter to the constructor. This is of course a BC break. We should merge this before 0.3.0

How Has This Been Tested?

Unit tests and inspector

Breaking Changes

Yes

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@Nyholm Nyholm added the BC Break Breaking the Backwards Compatibility Promise label Dec 27, 2025
@Nyholm Nyholm added this to the 0.3.0 milestone Dec 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

BC Break Breaking the Backwards Compatibility Promise Status: Reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants