Filesystem-based logs and schemas for legislative data #115
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…osal Add draft proposal for filesystem logs and schemas
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This proposal introduces an optional, filesystem-based representation for distributing legislative data, centered on append-only log records and explicit JSON Schemas.
The goal is to support bulk access, reproducibility, and file-native analytics workflows while remaining aligned with existing OCD identifiers and object models. Log entries are designed to be self-contained and analyzable independently of their original directory context, enabling diffing, replayability, and decentralized reuse.
This proposal is additive and does not modify existing OCD object models or APIs.