Use "Open edX" trademark properly in the documentation

[sarina]

PR to test whether docs are building

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.58%. Comparing base (a8956e3) to head (142a69d).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #98   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.58%   90.58%           
=======================================
  Files          47       47           
  Lines        4310     4310           
  Branches      271      271           
=======================================
  Hits         3904     3904           
  Misses        317      317           
  Partials       89       89           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	90.58% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sarina]

@felipemontoya do you want any of these builds to be required on this repo? (currently only the CLA check is)

[felipemontoya]

Thank you @sarina. The check looks to be reporting back to me.

That should be enough. I don't think that having the check as required is necessary but I will not merge it anyways if any of the builds are failing. However if it is customary that this check is required, please make it so.

[felipemontoya]

PR checks look good to me. The changes in the docs are also good and appreciated.

[sarina]

I don't think the docs build needs to be required, I was more asking about the other CI builds. Feel free to ping me at any point if you'd like any of the checks to be turned into required ones