Skip to content

Conversation

@fparain
Copy link
Collaborator

@fparain fparain commented Dec 18, 2025

Please review this very small change to rename InstanceKlass::null_marker_offset(int i) into InstanceKlass::field_null_marker_offset(int i) to highlight the fact that the method returns the null marker offset of a given field and not the null marker offset for the current class.

Thank you.

Fred


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Committer)

Issue

  • JDK-8373708: [lworld] InstanceKlass::null_marker_offset(int i) is misleading (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1835/head:pull/1835
$ git checkout pull/1835

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1835
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1835/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1835

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1835

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1835.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 18, 2025

👋 Welcome back fparain! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into lworld will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 18, 2025

@fparain This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8373708: [lworld] InstanceKlass::null_marker_offset(int i) is misleading

Reviewed-by: stefank, coleenp

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 120 new commits pushed to the lworld branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the lworld branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 18, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@stefank stefank left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thanks for fixing!

@fparain
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fparain commented Jan 5, 2026

Thanks @stefank for the review.

@fparain
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fparain commented Jan 5, 2026

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 5, 2026

@fparain This pull request has not yet been marked as ready for integration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 5, 2026
@fparain
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fparain commented Jan 5, 2026

Thanks @coleenp for the review.

@fparain
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fparain commented Jan 5, 2026

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Going to push as commit 90dfb43.
Since your change was applied there have been 120 commits pushed to the lworld branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 5, 2026
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 5, 2026
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 5, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 5, 2026

@fparain Pushed as commit 90dfb43.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants