Replace for loop with counter by range#149
Merged
orgrim merged 2 commits intoorgrim:masterfrom Apr 24, 2025
Merged
Conversation
When possible, use range instead of for loop with increment. This is a bit easier to read. This commits also removes the unnecessary id from dumper().
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When possible, use range instead of for loop with increment. This is a bit easier to read. This commits also removes the unnecessary id from dumper().
Also use slice.Contains() instead of looping over a slice to search an item.