docs: fix duplicate conclusion labels#3870
Conversation
Add unique reference labels for conclusion sections: - Add serving-conclusion label (eager_tutorials/serving.rst) - Add pt2e_quant_xpu_inductor-conclusion label - Add pt2e_quantizer-conclusion label - Add pt2e_quant_ptq-conclusion label - Add pt2e_quant_openvino_inductor-conclusion label - Add pt2e_quant_qat-conclusion label - Add pt2e_quant_x86_inductor-conclusion label Resolves 7 duplicate 'conclusion' label warnings from issue pytorch#3863 (Category 2)
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/ao/3870
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 06e3d1d with merge base edd8abb ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
Hi @ArivunidhiA! Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@meta.com. Thanks! |
|
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks! |
|
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks! |
Add unique reference labels for conclusion sections to resolve autosectionlabel conflicts:
Resolves 7 duplicate conclusion label warnings from issue #3863