-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
feat(sas backends): Offboard a team from a backend if it's removed from backend list #129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @rp926463-arch, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a critical feature to the Group controller: the ability to automatically detect and offboard from backends that have been removed from a Group's specification. This ensures that resources provisioned in external systems are properly de-provisioned when they are no longer desired, preventing resource leakage and maintaining system hygiene. The implementation includes robust error handling for various failure scenarios and is backed by comprehensive unit and integration tests. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Backend fades away,Cleaned up, no trace left behind,Order now restored. Footnotes
|
3052a02 to
37afd72
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a crucial feature for handling the removal of backends from a group's specification, including detection and offboarding logic. The implementation is sound and is accompanied by an impressive suite of comprehensive tests that cover numerous edge cases and error paths, which significantly boosts confidence in the changes. My review includes a few suggestions to enhance robustness, particularly concerning cache operations to prevent potential race conditions, and to improve code style and readability for better maintainability.
- Fix non-atomic cache update by properly handling cache deletion/update logic - Fix delayed error handling by checking GetTransformedGroupName error immediately - Fix naming convention: transformed_group_name → transformedGroupName (camelCase) - Fix misleading test name to accurately reflect what is being tested - Improve cache atomicity: either update with remaining backends or delete if empty - Enhance error logging with proper context before checking errors Addresses review feedback from PR redhat-data-and-ai#129 Signed-off-by: Roshan Patil <roshpati@redhat.com>
8335d6d to
f0e5d5c
Compare
f0e5d5c to
efbd9d2
Compare
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a crucial feature for handling the removal of backends from a Group custom resource, ensuring that resources are properly cleaned up. The implementation is well-structured with new functions for detection and offboarding, and it is accompanied by a comprehensive set of unit tests. My review focuses on enhancing the robustness of the error handling in the offboarding process, suggesting minor code cleanup, and pointing out a significant gap in test coverage for the successful offboarding flow and its cache interactions, which should be addressed to ensure the feature is fully reliable.
Resolved all high and medium priority review issues: ### Error Handling (Medium Priority) - Fixed offboardFromRemovedBackends to collect all errors instead of stopping at first - Now continues processing all backends and logs detailed error information - Returns first error for reconcile retry but processes everything ### Code Quality (Low Priority) - Extracted getBackendKey() helper to eliminate DRY violations - Used helper consistently in detectRemovedBackends and offboardFromRemovedBackends - Removed PR reviewer comment from production code ### Test Coverage (Medium Priority) - Added comprehensive test for error collection behavior - Test validates that multiple backends are processed even with failures - Simplified tests to avoid complex mocking while maintaining coverage All 18 controller tests passing with 32.9% code coverage. No linting errors. Ready for review. Addresses: redhat-data-and-ai#129 Signed-off-by: Roshan Patil <roshpati@redhat.com>
27f341a to
7a0425d
Compare
…verage This PR implements the critical feature to automatically detect and offboard from backends that have been removed from a Group's specification, ensuring proper resource cleanup and preventing resource leakage. ## Core Features - Add handleRemovedBackends() to detect and offboard from removed backends - Add detectRemovedBackends() to compare spec vs status for removed backends - Add offboardFromRemovedBackends() to perform cleanup using existing DeleteTeamByID - Integrate backend removal detection into main Reconcile loop for continuous monitoring ## Test Coverage - Add comprehensive unit tests covering all error paths and edge cases - Test backend deleted while other backends exist (cache updated correctly) - Test last backend deleted (entire cache entry removed) - Test error handling for cache operations after backend deletion - Test graceful handling of cache misses, client creation errors, and transformation failures - All 18 controller tests passing with 32.9% code coverage ## Code Quality Improvements - Implement DRY principle by extracting getBackendKey() helper function - Replace all duplicate backend key generation logic with helper function - Enhanced error collection - continues processing all backends even with failures - Clean up unused imports and resolve all linter errors - Remove PR reviewer comments from production code ## Technical Details - Robust error handling for group name transformation failures - Graceful handling of missing backend configurations - Proper cache management for partial and complete backend removal - Zero linting issues - production ready Resolves: DATA-3526 Signed-off-by: Roshan Patil <roshpati@redhat.com>
7a0425d to
c2ef48e
Compare
…an in tests - Fixed test panics caused by rover backend global config file loading - Changed failing tests to use fivetran backends which don't require external config files - Updated test expectations to match actual error messages - All 21 controller tests now passing successfully - Resolves GitHub Actions CI failures Signed-off-by: Roshan Patil <roshpati@redhat.com>
e0120c8 to
78fac2e
Compare
…verage
Resolves: DATA-3526
Changes
📝 Description
What changed?
Why is this change needed?
Dependencies
🧪 Testing
Test Coverage
Performance Impact
🚀 Deployment
Deploy Steps
Prerequisites
Post-Deployment Monitoring
Rollback Plan
Details:
⚙️ Configuration Changes
✅ Developer Checklist