Skip to content

Conversation

@jog1t
Copy link
Contributor

@jog1t jog1t commented Jan 8, 2026

No description provided.

@railway-app
Copy link

railway-app bot commented Jan 8, 2026

🚅 Deployed to the rivet-pr-3791 environment in rivet-frontend

Service Status Web Updated (UTC)
frontend-cloud-prod ✅ Success (View Logs) Web Jan 8, 2026 at 2:01 am
frontend-inspector ✅ Success (View Logs) Web Jan 8, 2026 at 2:01 am
frontend-cloud-staging ✅ Success (View Logs) Web Jan 8, 2026 at 2:01 am
website ✅ Success (View Logs) Web Jan 8, 2026 at 1:58 am

@railway-app railway-app bot temporarily deployed to rivet-frontend / rivet-pr-3791 January 8, 2026 01:58 Destroyed
Copy link
Contributor Author

jog1t commented Jan 8, 2026


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Jan 8, 2026

PR Review

Summary

This PR fixes the issue where projects in the context switcher weren't hoverable. The root cause was that PrefetchedProjectListItem wasn't forwarding the onHover and onSelect props to ProjectListItem.


✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

Good:

  • Root cause fix is correct: The main issue (missing prop forwarding in PrefetchedProjectListItem) is properly addressed using the spread operator ({...props})
  • Defensive programming: Added null check for parentRect in safe-hover.tsx:19 prevents potential runtime errors
  • Code consistency: Type import style change (import type { Project }) aligns with TypeScript best practices
  • Minor optimization: Destructuring top and bottom in safe-hover.tsx:21 reduces method calls

Suggestions:

  • The + 5 offset added in safe-hover.tsx:37 appears to be a magic number. Consider:

    • Adding a comment explaining why 5px is needed
    • Or making it a named constant: const SAFE_X_OFFSET = 5;
    // Add small offset to prevent hover jitter at element boundaries
    el.style.setProperty("--safe-x", `${e.nativeEvent.offsetX + 5}px`);

🐛 Potential Bugs & Issues

No bugs identified. The changes are safe and address the reported issue.


⚡ Performance Considerations

  • The destructuring of top and bottom is a micro-optimization that reduces getBoundingClientRect() calls from 2 to 1 - good change
  • The spread operator ({...props}) has negligible performance impact in React
  • Overall performance impact: Neutral to slightly positive

🔒 Security Concerns

No security issues identified. The changes are limited to UI interaction logic.


🧪 Test Coverage

Recommendation: Consider adding a test to verify that:

  1. PrefetchedProjectListItem correctly forwards onHover and onSelect callbacks
  2. Hovering over prefetched projects (first 5 items) triggers the onHover callback

This would prevent regression of this bug in the future.


📝 Additional Notes

Non-critical formatting changes:

  • The JSX reformatting in context-switcher.tsx:274-298 improves readability but isn't strictly necessary for the fix
  • The React.ReactNodeReactNode change in safe-hover.tsx:9 is stylistic

Overall verdict: ✅ Approved - The fix correctly addresses the issue. The suggested improvements are optional enhancements for code clarity.

@jog1t jog1t marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2026 02:01
@jog1t jog1t merged commit 5e14ed9 into main Jan 8, 2026
6 of 13 checks passed
@jog1t jog1t deleted the 01-08-fix_frontend_not_hoverable_projects_in_context_switcher branch January 8, 2026 02:01
@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Jan 8, 2026

Graphite Automations

"Test" took an action on this PR • (01/08/26)

1 assignee was added to this PR based on Kacper Wojciechowski's automation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants