feat: add concept of unowned globs to team configs #117
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds the ability to specify
unowned_globsfor a team. The primary use case of this is to allow more granularity in how ownership globs are defined.Suppose you want Team A to own everything that has a folder named
fooin the path, so you would define a glob like:**/foo/**/*but at the same time, you want Team B to own everything in a specific folder, regardless if it has afoofolder in it or not. So you would define a glob like:shared/**/*, but if it actually has afoofolder in it, then the validation would complain that you cannot have overlapping ownership between teams.With this, you can now specify that Team does not own
shared/**/foo/*and everyone is happy.To the best of my knowledge, nothing needs to change in the
CODEOWNERSgeneration, since it already puts less specific globs at the top and more specific ones at the bottom. So in effect, the above ownership rules will be enforced just fine.This fixes #116