Update rubocop-rake 0.6.0 → 0.7.1 (major) #960
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
depfu
bot
force-pushed
the
depfu/update/rubocop-rake-0.7.1
branch
from
eb99a50 to
c6edac7
Compare
depfu
bot
force-pushed
the
depfu/update/rubocop-rake-0.7.1
branch
from
c6edac7 to
c98d0ed
Compare
depfu
bot
force-pushed
the
depfu/update/rubocop-rake-0.7.1
branch
2 times, most recently
from
6b2417f to
f5145c0
Compare
depfu
bot
force-pushed
the
depfu/update/rubocop-rake-0.7.1
branch
from
f5145c0 to
d8b04f1
Compare
depfu
bot
force-pushed
the
depfu/update/rubocop-rake-0.7.1
branch
from
d8b04f1 to
de375c2
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
✳️ rubocop-rake (0.6.0 → 0.7.1) · Repo · Changelog
Release Notes
0.7.1 (from changelog)
0.7.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 35 commits:
Cut 0.7.1Merge pull request #59 from koic/fix_incorrect_plugin_versionFix incorrect plugin version when displaing `rubocop -V`Tweak the changelogCut 0.7.0Merge pull request #58 from koic/plugin_lint_rollerPluginfy RuboCop RakeSuppress redundant configuration logging for rubocop-rakeMerge pull request #57 from koic/require_ruby_27_or_laterDrop Ruby 2.5 and 2.6 for runtime environmentFix a build error in the ruby-head (Ruby 3.5dev)Suppress `InternalAffairs/NodeTypeMultiplePredicates` offenseDisable `InternalAffairs/OnSendWithoutOnCSend` copCI against Ruby 3.4Suppress a RuboCop's offenseSuppress RuboCop's offensesMerge pull request #52 from m-nakamura145/move-from-circleci-to-github-actionsIntroduce Github ActionsMerge pull request #47 from janie314/2023-07-09-jd-README-doc-touchupAdd import path to README example, and lint README.md with DenoSuppress a warningSuppress RuboCop offensesCI against Ruby 3.2Suppress `RSpec/NoExpectationExample`'s offensesSuppress RuboCop offensesCI against Ruby 3.1Merge pull request #43 from pvdb/update_usage_instructionsAdd more usage instructionsCI against Ruby 3.1Use `cimg/ruby` instead of deprecated `circleci/ruby` imagesMerge pull request #40 from dvandersluis/gemspec/require-mfaSet `rubygems_mfa_required` in gemspec.Enable new copsMerge pull request #39 from koic/use_restrict_on_sendUse `RESTRICT_ON_SEND`Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase.All Depfu comment commands