Skip to content

Conversation

@DanielEScherzer
Copy link
Contributor

"only for closures that {x} can be {y}" repeats the limitation; it should either be "only closures that {x} can be {y}", or, if the capability ("{y}") is implicit, it can be "only for closures that {x}". Go with the first option that keeps the context, and remove the extra "for".

"only for closures that {x} can be {y}" repeats the limitation; it should
either be "only closures that {x} can be {y}", or, if the capability ("{y}") is
implicit, it can be "only for closures that {x}". Go with the first option that
keeps the context, and remove the extra "for".
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer label Dec 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I pushed up some nearby fixes as well.

@ehuss ehuss enabled auto-merge December 18, 2025 16:31
@ehuss ehuss added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 18, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit b1a00d6 Dec 18, 2025
5 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer label Dec 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants