[WIP] Mongo db backend updated#17
Open
sibiryakov wants to merge 3 commits intoscrapinghub:masterfrom
sibiryakov:MongoDb-backend
Open
[WIP] Mongo db backend updated#17sibiryakov wants to merge 3 commits intoscrapinghub:masterfrom sibiryakov:MongoDb-backend
sibiryakov wants to merge 3 commits intoscrapinghub:masterfrom
sibiryakov:MongoDb-backend
Conversation
…mory and sqlalchemy-based backends.
Page/Request instance creation decomposition in backends
Closed
Member
Author
Contributor
|
Looks OK to me |
Member
Author
|
Great, I think I'll do some docs and tests. |
Member
Author
|
@bbotella Honestly, I don't think people will be using MongoDB backend because of performance, instead because of ease of development and schemaless concept. Therefore, I would stay with most transparent MongoDb item possible. |
5a5c9e3 to
86af593
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on a solution made by @bbotella at #6