Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here's a quick and dirty update to the currently included USI-LS patches. This updates all relevant parts to add
USI_SwapController,USI_SwappableBay,andUSI_Convertermodules, and changes the old Life Support and Habitat modules to the newUSILS_LifeSupportRecyclerSwapOptionandUSILS_HabitationSwapOptionso they work on newer versions of USI-LS.Where necessary to add life support or habitat values, I used values from other similar parts that I could find configs for (3 person crew module recycler percentage the same as 3 person crew pod from Near Future Spacecraft, for instance). These values may not be balanced but I won't know until I really dig in and give them a test, which I intend to do over the next week or two. For the SSTU Hab parts, all I really did was a quick find/replace job to make them all work, I didn't change any of the already existing values.
I can't speak to the balance of this patch since I tried to keep it as close to original as I could. I'll have to explore that further in my own testing, but I do welcome feedback and will make adjustments if anything is wildly out of balance. In any case, I figure having a patch that works, even if it's a little unbalanced, is better than having a patch that's outdated and doesn't do anything.