(Closes #3060) reference accesses for intrinsicCall

[LonelyCat124]

No description provided.

[LonelyCat124]

Follow-on to #3119

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.95%. Comparing base (bc9b4db) to head (d51d49a).

❌ Your project check has failed because you have indirect coverage changes. Learn more about Unexpected Coverage Changes and reasons for indirect coverage changes.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3125      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.95%   99.95%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         377      377              
  Lines       53667    53766      +99     
==========================================
+ Hits        53645    53740      +95     
- Misses         22       26       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[LonelyCat124]

@sergisiso I have a first implementation of this now if you want to examine it if you have time. Its currently "blocked" by #3119 (which is in turn dependent on #3110 ) so there's very much no rush on this, especially if I do solve some other issues before we merge 3319.

[LonelyCat124]

Moved this up to date with latest master and #3119, so now its ready to be updated using argument names instead of any indices.