Remove optional documentation for LetFunction#248
Open
jfmengels wants to merge 1 commit intobreaking-changes-v8from
Open
Remove optional documentation for LetFunction#248jfmengels wants to merge 1 commit intobreaking-changes-v8from
jfmengels wants to merge 1 commit intobreaking-changes-v8from
Conversation
jfmengels
force-pushed
the
breaking-changes-v8
branch
from
eff82e1 to
0f43132
Compare
jfmengels
force-pushed
the
let-function-no-documentation
branch
from
5f04e37 to
3058427
Compare
jfmengels
force-pushed
the
breaking-changes-v8
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7ccc635 to
1787a7f
Compare
jfmengels
force-pushed
the
let-function-no-documentation
branch
from
3058427 to
1b4df1f
Compare
jfmengels
force-pushed
the
let-function-no-documentation
branch
from
1b4df1f to
e6be6be
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Let functions can't have documentation, so this reflects the syntax better.
I'm not sure whether we should introduce a new type alias or not 🤔