Skip to content

Conversation

@willhbang
Copy link
Contributor

@willhbang willhbang commented Aug 13, 2025

Change Description

Quality Management System

releases:
    - UL-RLS-5
software-parts:
    - id: WEB

PR Dependency Tree

This tree was auto-generated by Charcoal

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Added PR template sections for Change Description and Quality Management System, with fields for release identifiers and software-part classification.
  • Chores

    • Simplified CI triggers to favor PR events; removed certain push- and review-based triggers and a standalone test workflow.
    • Adjusted CI steps to run checks on all PRs, added system dependency install, and enhanced reporting to include commit hash, PR URL, and merge metadata; removed some wrapper workflow references.

PR Dependency Tree

This tree was auto-generated by Charcoal

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 13, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Updates PR template with an ultralight YAML-like metadata block. Adjusts CI workflows: changes Playwright and pull-request workflow triggers and Ultralight inputs, removes branch gating on Ultralight, deletes the pytest workflow, and removes a couple of wrapper report-commit workflows. No source code or public API changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
PR template
.github/pull_request_template.md
Adds "Change Description" and "Quality Management System" sections including an ultralight fenced YAML-like block (releases, software-parts). Documentation/template-only change.
Playwright workflow
.github/workflows/playwright.yml
Removes push triggers for main/master; limits PR trigger to types [opened, edited, reopened, synchronize]; adds apt-get update && install -y libasound2; removes branch conditional so Ultralight runs for PRs; replaces ultralight-url input with commit-hash, pr-url, and is-merge-commit.
Pull-request workflow
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
Removes on.pull_request_review trigger; adds commit-hash, is-merge-commit, and pr-url inputs to the Ultralight report step; retains existing merge-allowed conditional gate.
Deleted pytest workflow
.github/workflows/pytest.yml
Entire workflow removed (Pytest job, PR URL extraction script, Python setup, tests, and Ultralight reporting on main). File deleted.
Removed/updated report-commit & wrapper files
Wrapper removals
.github/workflows/report-commit/pull-request.yml, .../push-to-main.yml
Removed reusable reference "../pull-request.yml" from report-commit/pull-request.yml and deleted report-commit/push-to-main.yml wrapper that referenced ../push-to-main.yml. Removes those wrapper delegations.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant Dev as Developer
  participant GH as GitHub
  participant WF_PR as pull-request.yml
  participant WF_PW as playwright.yml
  participant UL as Ultralight Action

  Dev->>GH: Open/Edit/Reopen/Synchronize PR
  GH-->>WF_PR: Trigger pull-request workflow (PR events)
  GH-->>WF_PW: Trigger playwright workflow (PR events)
  WF_PR->>UL: Report commit (commit-hash, pr-url, is-merge-commit=true)
  WF_PW->>UL: Report commit (commit-hash, pr-url, is-merge-commit=true)
  note over WF_PW: Ultralight step runs for PRs without branch gating
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes

Poem

I twitch my whiskers, code in sight,
Workflows hop under PR light.
Templates snug with YAML cheer,
Hashes bound and reports appear.
A carrot wink — the rabbit's near. 🥕🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e920427 and e4bd018.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/playwright.yml (3 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch rls-demo

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a2e5ff3 and c61065f.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/pull_request_template.md (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/playwright.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .github/pull_request_template.md
  • .github/workflows/playwright.yml

Comment on lines +21 to +23
commit-hash: ${{ github.sha }}
is-merge-commit: true
pr-url: ${{ github.event.pull_request.html_url }}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Use PR head SHA and correct merge flag; github.sha may be a synthetic merge commit in PR workflows

In pull_request events, github.sha often points to a temporary merge ref that GitHub creates for CI, not the actual PR head commit. Also, hardcoding is-merge-commit: true is misleading for PRs (these commits are typically not merge commits).

Consider this change for accuracy:

-          commit-hash: ${{ github.sha }}
-          is-merge-commit: true
+          commit-hash: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
+          is-merge-commit: false

If you want the same workflow snippet to be portable across multiple event types, use fallbacks:

  • commit-hash: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha || github.sha }}
  • is-merge-commit: ${{ github.event_name != 'pull_request' }}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml around lines 21 to 23: the workflow uses
github.sha and hardcodes is-merge-commit: true which can point to GitHub’s
synthetic merge commit for PRs and incorrectly flag PR runs as merge commits;
update the commit-hash to prefer the PR head (use
github.event.pull_request.head.sha with a fallback to github.sha) and make
is-merge-commit conditional (true only when the event is not a pull_request), so
the values correctly reflect PR head commits and real merge commits.

@willhbang willhbang closed this Aug 13, 2025
@willhbang willhbang reopened this Aug 22, 2025
@willhbang willhbang closed this Aug 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants