-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Sourcery refactored master branch #61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
| total = 0 | ||
| for char in string_num: | ||
| total += int(char) ** len(string_num) | ||
| total = sum(int(char) ** len(string_num) for char in string_num) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function is_armstrong_number refactored with the following changes:
- Convert for loop into call to sum() (
sum-comprehension)
|
|
||
| grains_val = 1 | ||
| for num in range(1, number): | ||
| for _ in range(1, number): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function square refactored with the following changes:
- Replace unused for index with underscore (
for-index-underscore)
| if year % 4 == 0: | ||
| if year % 100 == 0: | ||
| if year % 400 == 0: | ||
| return True | ||
| return False | ||
| return True | ||
| else: | ||
| if year % 4 != 0: | ||
| return False | ||
| return year % 400 == 0 if year % 100 == 0 else True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function is_leap_year refactored with the following changes:
- Swap if/else branches (
swap-if-else-branches) - Remove unnecessary else after guard condition (
remove-unnecessary-else) - Simplify boolean if expression (
boolean-if-exp-identity) - Lift code into else after jump in control flow [×2] (
reintroduce-else) - Replace if statement with if expression [×2] (
assign-if-exp) - Remove unnecessary casts to int, str, float or bool (
remove-unnecessary-cast)
| return True | ||
| else: | ||
| return False | ||
| return len(abset) == 26 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function is_pangram refactored with the following changes:
- Replace if statement with if expression (
assign-if-exp) - Simplify boolean if expression (
boolean-if-exp-identity) - Remove unnecessary casts to int, str, float or bool (
remove-unnecessary-cast)
| for val in range(1, number): | ||
| if number % val == 0: | ||
| total += val | ||
| total = sum(val for val in range(1, number) if number % val == 0) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function classify refactored with the following changes:
- Convert for loop into call to sum() (
sum-comprehension)
| self.area_code = self.number[0:3] | ||
| if self.area_code[0] == "0" or self.area_code[0] == "1": | ||
| self.area_code = self.number[:3] | ||
| if self.area_code[0] in ["0", "1"]: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function PhoneNumber.__init__ refactored with the following changes:
- Replace a[0:x] with a[:x] and a[x:len(a)] with a[x:] (
remove-redundant-slice-index) - Replace multiple comparisons of same variable with
inoperator (merge-comparisons)
| startidx = 0 | ||
| result = [] | ||
| while startidx < len(strand): | ||
| for startidx in range(0, len(strand), 3): | ||
| codon = strand[startidx:startidx + 3] | ||
| if codon in STOP_CODONS: | ||
| return result | ||
| else: | ||
| result.append(CODON_TO_PROTEIN[codon]) | ||
| startidx += 3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function proteins refactored with the following changes:
- Move assignment closer to its usage within a block (
move-assign-in-block) - Replace while with for (
while-to-for)
| return False | ||
|
|
||
| return True | ||
| return 0 not in sides and a + b >= c and b + c >= a and a + c >= b |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function is_triangle refactored with the following changes:
- Lift code into else after jump in control flow (
reintroduce-else) - Replace if statement with if expression (
assign-if-exp) - Simplify boolean if expression (
boolean-if-exp-identity) - Remove unnecessary casts to int, str, float or bool (
remove-unnecessary-cast)
| if start_verse == 1: | ||
| pieces = [start] + ["a Partridge in a Pear Tree."] | ||
| else: | ||
| pieces = [start] + LIST[-start_verse:] | ||
| return pieces | ||
| return ( | ||
| [start] + ["a Partridge in a Pear Tree."] | ||
| if start_verse == 1 | ||
| else [start] + LIST[-start_verse:] | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function recite refactored with the following changes:
- Replace if statement with if expression (
assign-if-exp) - Inline variable that is immediately returned (
inline-immediately-returned-variable)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR Type: Refactoring
Summary of PR: This PR introduces a series of refactoring changes aimed at simplifying and optimizing the codebase. It includes the use of list comprehensions, simplification of conditional statements, and the removal of unnecessary variables and loops.
General PR suggestions
- Ensure that refactored logic accurately reflects the original intent and rules, especially in cases like the leap year calculation where the logic has been significantly altered.
- When simplifying expressions, particularly with mathematical operations, consider if there is a more efficient way to achieve the same result, such as using direct mathematical formulas instead of loops.
- Review the changes for any potential logical errors introduced during refactoring, such as the triangle inequality condition, to maintain the correctness of the program.
- While the refactoring has generally improved readability and performance, it's important to validate that the changes have not introduced any regressions or altered the behavior of the code in unintended ways.
Your trial expires on December 14, 2023. Please email tim@sourcery.ai to continue using Sourcery ✨
| else: | ||
| pieces = [start] + LIST[-start_verse:] | ||
| return pieces | ||
| return ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (llm): Consider using a ternary expression directly in the return statement for improved readability.
| return ( | |
| return [start] + (['a Partridge in a Pear Tree.'] if start_verse == 1 else LIST[-start_verse:]) |
| else: | ||
| if year % 4 != 0: | ||
| return False | ||
| return year % 400 == 0 if year % 100 == 0 else True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
issue (llm): The refactored leap year check is incorrect. It will return True for all years not divisible by 100, which is not the correct leap year rule.
| return year % 400 == 0 if year % 100 == 0 else True | |
| return year % 4 == 0 and (year % 100 != 0 or year % 400 == 0) |
| return False | ||
|
|
||
| return True | ||
| return 0 not in sides and a + b >= c and b + c >= a and a + c >= b |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
issue (llm): The triangle inequality check should use strict inequality '>' rather than '>=' to ensure that the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the remaining side.
| return 0 not in sides and a + b >= c and b + c >= a and a + c >= b | |
| return 0 not in sides and a + b > c and b + c > a and a + c > b |
| startidx = 0 | ||
| result = [] | ||
| while startidx < len(strand): | ||
| for startidx in range(0, len(strand), 3): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
praise (llm): Good job on simplifying the loop for iterating over the codons using a range with a step of 3.
|
|
||
| grains_val = 1 | ||
| for num in range(1, number): | ||
| for _ in range(1, number): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (llm): Instead of using a loop to calculate the number of grains, consider using a direct mathematical expression for better performance.
| for _ in range(1, number): | |
| return 2 ** (number - 1) |
Branch
masterrefactored by Sourcery.If you're happy with these changes, merge this Pull Request using the Squash and merge strategy.
See our documentation here.
Run Sourcery locally
Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:
Review changes via command line
To manually merge these changes, make sure you're on the
masterbranch, then run:Help us improve this pull request!