Skip to content

Conversation

@dharaneesk
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

Strengths:

  • Both solutions are correct and efficiently implemented.
  • The code is well-commented and easy to understand.
  • The WordSearch.java solution includes smart optimizations (search pruning) that improve performance.
  • The time and space complexity analyses are accurate and well-explained.

Areas for Improvement:

  • In NQueens.java, the method isSafe could be slightly optimized by combining the row check and diagonal checks into a single loop, though the current implementation is already clear and correct.
  • In WordSearch.java, the search pruning logic (checking first and last character occurrences) is a great optimization, but it might be worth mentioning that this is an optional enhancement and not strictly necessary for correctness.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants