Skip to content

Conversation

@candida17
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

Strengths:

  • The solutions are correct and efficient, matching the expected time and space complexities.
  • The code is well-organized and easy to follow.
  • Comments and variable names are clear and helpful.

Areas for Improvement:

  • In Problem1.java, the isSafe method could be slightly optimized by combining the three checks into a single loop, though this is a minor improvement.
  • In Problem2.java, the space complexity comment could be more precise by mentioning O(L) for the recursive stack, where L is the length of the word.
  • Consider adding more edge case checks (e.g., empty board or word) in Problem2.java, though the current implementation handles them correctly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants