Done Two-Pointer-1

[Sreeja-99]

No description provided.

[super30admin]

• Leetcode_11.java: Excellent job! The solution is efficient and well-structured. No improvements needed.
• Leetcode_15.java: The second approach is well-implemented and efficient. The first approach could be simplified by removing the commented-out code and redundant checks. Consider focusing on the second approach as it is more efficient and cleaner.
• Leetcode_75.java: Great job! The solution is efficient and follows best practices. No improvements needed.

Overall, the student has demonstrated a good understanding of the problems and has provided efficient solutions. The main area for improvement is cleaning up redundant code and focusing on the most efficient approaches.

[super30admin]

• Strengths:

  • The student demonstrates a good understanding of the two-pointer technique and has applied it correctly in all three problems.
  • The solutions are efficient and handle edge cases well.
  • The code is generally clean and well-commented, which aids readability.

• Areas for Improvement:

  • In Leetcode_15.java, the first approach can be simplified by removing the redundant ansStr and related string operations. The second approach is already optimal and clean.
  • Some comments are redundant and could be removed to make the code more concise.
  • The helper method in Leetcode_15.java could be better named to reflect its purpose more clearly.