Skip to content

Conversation

@JainShubham23
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  1. Correctness: The solution correctly merges the two sorted arrays in-place, starting from the end of the arrays to avoid overwriting elements in nums1 that haven't been processed yet. This is an efficient approach and handles all edge cases, including when nums2 has remaining elements after nums1 is exhausted.
  2. Time Complexity: The student correctly identifies the time complexity as O(m + n), which is optimal for this problem.
  3. Space Complexity: The student correctly identifies the space complexity as O(1), as no additional space is used beyond the input arrays.
  4. Code Quality: The code is clean, well-commented, and easy to understand. The variable names are descriptive, and the logic is straightforward.
  5. Efficiency: The solution is efficient and does not require any further optimizations. The use of three pointers (p1, p2, and idx) is a standard and effective approach for this problem.

Areas for Improvement:

  • While the solution is correct, the student could consider adding a brief comment explaining the overall strategy (merging from the end) to make the code even more self-documenting.
  • The student could also ensure consistency in the formatting (e.g., spacing around operators) to maintain readability, although the current formatting is generally good.

Strengths:

  • The student demonstrates a clear understanding of the two-pointer technique and applies it effectively.
  • The solution is concise and avoids unnecessary complexity, which is a sign of good problem-solving skills.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants