-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
First attempt for allowing acquisition consumers to have different endpoints #566
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #566 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 83.52% 83.19% -0.33%
==========================================
Files 133 133
Lines 10718 10728 +10
==========================================
- Hits 8952 8925 -27
- Misses 1766 1803 +37 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Look at https://github.com/ufo-kit/concert/blob/different-producers/concert/experiments/base.py#L169-L171. Producer should be started last to make sure the consumers are ready when producers starts. @MarcusZuber you can this already now. |
ec6a332 to
6a0e712
Compare
|
What I don't like so far is that in our current implementation the Acquisition reauires a producer which needs to have the interace of a remote camera. |
|
Note (mostly) to myself: I think adding and removing acquistions in runtime screws it up. |
|
This is my current diff to make it working: I will try to push this soon, but wanted to put it here one to net forget it over the holidays. |
Addresses #565.
A full-blown working example
Tango setup
After the experiment run, darks and flats have mean 100 and radios 1000, which shows that radios use the second camera.