Test/cmd initial #18
Test/cmd initial #18
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@xenOs76 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpgrades Go to 1.25 in CI and go.mod, adds a coverage config and CI coverage job, introduces multiple CLI unit tests, routes CLI output through Cobra printers, updates Nix devenv to use nixpkgs-stable, and extends certinfo tests/testdata (adds expired cert case and a newline in output). Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)(Skipped — changes are CI, tests, configuration, and minor output routing; no new multi-component runtime control flow requiring visualization.) Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~22 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@coderabbitai help |
ChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
CodeRabbit commands
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit configuration file (
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @cmd/requests_test.go:
- Line 136: There is a typo in the test loop variable name: change the
misspelled variable "expexted" to "expected" in the for loop (the loop
declaration that reads "for _, expexted := range tt.expected {"); update any
subsequent references within that loop body to use "expected" so the variable
name is consistent.
In @devenv.yaml:
- Around line 6-7: The nixpkgs flake input uses the wrong branch name; update
the URL value under the nixpkgs-stable input so the GitHub branch is
release-25.11 instead of nixos-25.11 (i.e., change the URL string for the
nixpkgs-stable entry to github:NixOS/nixpkgs/release-25.11).
🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
.testcoverage.yml (1)
1-6: Configuration looks good; consider adding exclusion patterns.The coverage thresholds are reasonable, with the ascending pattern (70% file → 80% package → 90% total) allowing flexibility for hard-to-test files while maintaining high overall coverage. The
cover.outprofile is the standard Go coverage output.For maintainability, you may want to add an
excludesection to skip files that are inherently difficult to unit test (e.g.,main.go, CLI entry points, or generated code):exclude: paths: - main\.go$This is optional—only add it if you encounter coverage failures on files that shouldn't be counted.
cmd/requests.go (1)
62-100: Consider usingcmd.PrintErrfor error output.For consistency with the
cmd.Printchanges above, error messages could usecmd.PrintErrorcmd.PrintErrf. This would route all output through Cobra's writers, improving testability.♻️ Suggested refactor
_, err := os.Stat(viper.ConfigFileUsed()) if err != nil { - fmt.Printf("\nConfig file not found: %s\n", viper.ConfigFileUsed()) + cmd.PrintErrf("\nConfig file not found: %s\n", viper.ConfigFileUsed()) _ = cmd.Help() return } cfg, err := LoadConfig() if err != nil { - fmt.Print(err) + cmd.PrintErr(err) return }Apply similar changes to other
fmt.Print(err)calls at lines 81, 90, 94, and 99.go.mod (1)
3-3: Consider upgrading to Go 1.25.5.Go 1.25.4 is a valid release, but 1.25.5 is the latest stable patch in the 1.25 series (released December 2, 2025). Verify dependency compatibility before upgrading the toolchain.
cmd/config_test.go (2)
3-11: Unusedembedimport.The
embedpackage is imported but no//go:embeddirective is present in this file. Remove the unused import.♻️ Proposed fix
import ( - _ "embed" "testing" _ "github.com/breml/rootcerts"
21-23: Swaprequire.Equalarguments for clearer failure messages.Testify convention is
require.Equal(t, expected, actual). Currently, the actual value is first.♻️ Proposed fix
require.False(t, config.Debug) require.False(t, config.Verbose) - require.Equal(t, config.CaBundle, emptyString) + require.Equal(t, emptyString, config.CaBundle)internal/certinfo/certinfo_handlers_test.go (1)
227-244: Consider addingexpirationassertions to ECDSA and ED25519 test cases.The RSA test cases include expiration assertions (e.g.,
"23 hours from now"or"ago"), but the ECDSA and ED25519 cases leaveexpirationempty. Sincerequire.Contains(t, got, "")trivially passes, these cases don't verify the expiration output. For consistency and coverage, consider adding expected expiration strings.cmd/root_test.go (3)
3-10: Unusedembedimport.The
embedpackage is imported but no//go:embeddirective is present in this file.♻️ Proposed fix
import ( "bytes" - _ "embed" "testing" _ "github.com/breml/rootcerts"
57-87: Consider resettingrootCmdflags between test iterations to prevent state leakage.Cobra commands retain flag values across executions. Since
rootCmdis a package-level variable, flag state from one test case may leak into subsequent cases. Consider resetting flags or using a fresh command instance per test.♻️ Example reset pattern
for _, tc := range tests { tt := tc t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { + // Reset flags to defaults + rootCmd.Flags().Set("config", "") + rootCmd.Flags().Set("version", "false") + buf := new(bytes.Buffer) rootCmd.SetOut(buf)
77-79: Redundant condition.Since line 74 returns early when
tt.expectErroris true, theif !tt.expectErrorcheck at line 77 is always true and can be removed.♻️ Proposed fix
} - if !tt.expectError { - require.NoError(t, err) - } + require.NoError(t, err) got := buf.String()cmd/requests_test.go (3)
5-5: Unusedembedimport.The
_ "embed"import has no corresponding//go:embeddirective in this file. If it's not needed, remove it to avoid confusion.Suggested fix
import ( "bytes" - _ "embed" "testing" _ "github.com/breml/rootcerts"
110-119: SharedrootCmdcauses test isolation issues.Directly mutating the global
rootCmd(viaSetOut,SetErr,SetArgs) means tests cannot safely run in parallel, and state may leak between test cases or across test files. Consider resetting the command state after each test or instantiating a fresh command tree.Additionally, the
tt := tcloop variable capture is no longer needed in Go 1.22+ (the project is moving to Go 1.25 per the PR).Suggested cleanup
for _, tc := range tests { - tt := tc - - t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { + t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) { reqOut := new(bytes.Buffer) reqCmd := rootCmd reqCmd.SetOut(reqOut) reqCmd.SetErr(reqOut) - reqCmd.SetArgs(tt.args) + reqCmd.SetArgs(tc.args) err := reqCmd.Execute() + // Reset args to avoid leaking state + defer reqCmd.SetArgs(nil)
121-133: Early return missing after error assertions; conditional logic can be simplified.When
expectErroris true and an error is confirmed, the test continues to check!expectError(always false in that path) and then validates output. The commented// returnon line 128 suggests the intent was to exit early. Consider usingelseor returning after error validation to clarify intent.Suggested refactor
if tt.expectError { require.Error(t, err) for _, expected := range tt.errMsgs { require.ErrorContains(t, err, expected) } - - // return - } - - if !tt.expectError { + } else { require.NoError(t, err) }cmd/certinfo_test.go (2)
5-5: Unusedembedimport.Same as in
requests_test.go— no//go:embeddirective uses this import.Suggested fix
import ( "bytes" - _ "embed" "testing"
93-122: Duplicated test runner logic across test files.The test execution loop (lines 93–122) is nearly identical to
requests_test.go. Consider extracting a shared helper to reduce duplication and ensure consistent behavior:func runCmdTest(t *testing.T, args []string, expectError bool, errMsgs, expected []string) { t.Helper() out := new(bytes.Buffer) rootCmd.SetOut(out) rootCmd.SetErr(out) rootCmd.SetArgs(args) defer rootCmd.SetArgs(nil) err := rootCmd.Execute() if expectError { require.Error(t, err) for _, msg := range errMsgs { require.ErrorContains(t, err, msg) } } else { require.NoError(t, err) } got := out.String() for _, exp := range expected { require.Contains(t, got, exp) } }This also addresses:
- The
tt := tccapture (obsolete in Go 1.22+)- The
expextedtypo on line 119- The commented
// returnon line 111- Resetting args to avoid test pollution
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
devenv.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockinternal/certinfo/testdata/rsa-pkcs8-expired-crt.pemis excluded by!**/*.pem
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml.testcoverage.ymlcmd/certinfo_test.gocmd/config_test.gocmd/requests.gocmd/requests_test.gocmd/root.gocmd/root_test.godevenv.nixdevenv.yamlgo.modinternal/certinfo/certinfo_handlers.gointernal/certinfo/certinfo_handlers_test.gointernal/certinfo/main_test.gointernal/certinfo/testdata/README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: xenOs76
Repo: xenOs76/https-wrench PR: 16
File: devenv.nix:626-626
Timestamp: 2025-12-18T19:13:31.910Z
Learning: In the xenOs76/https-wrench repository's devenv.nix file, the `run-go-tests` command is intentionally excluded from the `enterTest` flow because Go unit tests are executed separately via GitHub Actions workflow (codeChecks.yml). This separation avoids redundancy, with devenv tests focusing on integration and CLI tests while GitHub Actions handles unit tests.
📚 Learning: 2025-11-08T16:00:48.187Z
Learnt from: xenOs76
Repo: xenOs76/https-wrench PR: 3
File: internal/requests/requests.go:164-182
Timestamp: 2025-11-08T16:00:48.187Z
Learning: In the https-wrench tool (xenOs76/https-wrench repository), do not enforce minimum TLS version constraints in the HTTP client configuration. The tool is designed to inspect and test TLS settings on various servers, including legacy ones, and needs the flexibility to connect to servers with older TLS versions.
Applied to files:
go.mod
📚 Learning: 2025-12-18T19:13:31.910Z
Learnt from: xenOs76
Repo: xenOs76/https-wrench PR: 16
File: devenv.nix:626-626
Timestamp: 2025-12-18T19:13:31.910Z
Learning: In the xenOs76/https-wrench repository's devenv.nix file, the `run-go-tests` command is intentionally excluded from the `enterTest` flow because Go unit tests are executed separately via GitHub Actions workflow (codeChecks.yml). This separation avoids redundancy, with devenv tests focusing on integration and CLI tests while GitHub Actions handles unit tests.
Applied to files:
devenv.nix
📚 Learning: 2025-11-29T14:05:35.000Z
Learnt from: xenOs76
Repo: xenOs76/https-wrench PR: 10
File: internal/requests/requests_test.go:918-997
Timestamp: 2025-11-29T14:05:35.000Z
Learning: In the https-wrench tool test suite (xenOs76/https-wrench repository), the user wants to be reminded in the future about potentially adding MinVersion enforcement to TLS configurations in test code, once legacy server compatibility becomes less critical.
Applied to files:
devenv.nix
🧬 Code graph analysis (5)
cmd/config_test.go (2)
internal/requests/requests.go (1)
RequestsMetaConfig(122-130)cmd/config.go (1)
NewHTTPSWrenchConfig(14-17)
internal/certinfo/certinfo_handlers_test.go (2)
internal/certinfo/common_handlers.go (1)
GetCertsFromBundle(104-148)internal/certinfo/main_test.go (1)
RSASamplePKCS8ExpiredCertificate(70-70)
cmd/root_test.go (2)
cmd/root.go (1)
Execute(83-88)internal/style/style.go (1)
Error(100-101)
cmd/certinfo_test.go (2)
cmd/root.go (1)
Execute(83-88)internal/style/style.go (1)
Error(100-101)
cmd/requests_test.go (1)
cmd/root.go (1)
Execute(83-88)
🪛 Gitleaks (8.30.0)
internal/certinfo/testdata/README.md
[high] 122-152: Identified a Private Key, which may compromise cryptographic security and sensitive data encryption.
(private-key)
🔇 Additional comments (15)
.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml (2)
18-21: LGTM!Narrowing the matrix to Go 1.25 aligns with the
go.modupdate and simplifies CI. Themax-parallel: 1setting is fine for a single-version matrix.
84-87: LGTM!The goreleaser job's Go version is consistent with the matrix and
go.modchanges.internal/certinfo/testdata/README.md (2)
1-5: LGTM!The README is well-structured documentation for generating test data. The Gitleaks static analysis warning (lines 122-152) is a false positive — the file contains
(REDACTED)placeholders, not actual private key material.
138-142: Good addition for test coverage.The expired certificate generation instructions support the new expired certificate test cases in
certinfo_handlers_test.go.devenv.nix (5)
5-9: LGTM!Clean introduction of
pkgs-stablefrom the newnixpkgs-stableinput. This allows pinning Go to a stable NixOS release while using rolling packages for other tools.
29-42: LGTM!Good additions:
gotestfor colorized test output andgotestsfor generating test stubs improve developer experience.
44-63: Reasonable security trade-off.Disabling
detect-private-keyswhile keepingripsecretsenabled is acceptable given the testdata directory contains intentional sample keys. The testdata path exclusions prevent false positives.
233-246: LGTM!Adding
2>&1ensures version output is captured regardless of whether the command writes to stdout or stderr.
592-602: LGTM!Switching to
gotestfor local test runs provides colorized output. Based on learnings,run-go-testsis intentionally excluded fromenterTestsince Go unit tests run via GitHub Actions.internal/certinfo/certinfo_handlers.go (1)
130-134: LGTM!Minor formatting adjustment adding spacing after CA certificates output.
cmd/requests.go (1)
44-55: LGTM!Using
cmd.Printinstead offmt.Printimproves testability by routing output through Cobra's configured writer.cmd/root.go (1)
72-72: LGTM!Using
cmd.Printlnroutes output through Cobra's configurable writer, enabling test capture viaSetOut. This aligns with the pattern in other command files and improves testability.internal/certinfo/certinfo_handlers_test.go (2)
168-172: LGTM!Correctly loads the expired certificate test data with proper error handling.
216-226: LGTM!The new expired certificate test case is well-structured. Using
"ago"as a partial match for the expiration field cleverly handles the time-relative expiration string for expired certificates.internal/certinfo/main_test.go (1)
70-70: LGTM!The new test data reference follows the established naming convention and file path pattern used by other PKCS8 certificate test variables. The test data file exists and the variable is used in
certinfo_handlers_test.go.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| got := reqOut.String() | ||
| for _, expexted := range tt.expected { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo: expexted → expected.
Fix typo
- for _, expexted := range tt.expected {
- require.Contains(t, got, expexted)
+ for _, expected := range tt.expected {
+ require.Contains(t, got, expected)🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @cmd/requests_test.go at line 136, There is a typo in the test loop variable
name: change the misspelled variable "expexted" to "expected" in the for loop
(the loop declaration that reads "for _, expexted := range tt.expected {");
update any subsequent references within that loop body to use "expected" so the
variable name is consistent.
| nixpkgs-stable: | ||
| url: github:NixOS/nixpkgs/nixos-25.11 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the nixos-25.11 branch exists on NixOS/nixpkgs
response=$(curl -s -w "\n%{http_code}" "https://api.github.com/repos/NixOS/nixpkgs/branches/nixos-25.11")
http_code=$(echo "$response" | tail -n1)
body=$(echo "$response" | head -n-1)
echo "HTTP Status Code: $http_code"
if [ "$http_code" = "200" ]; then
echo "Branch exists"
echo "$body" | jq '.name' 2>/dev/null || echo "$body"
else
echo "Branch does not exist or error occurred"
fiRepository: xenOs76/https-wrench
Length of output: 184
🌐 Web query:
NixOS 25.11 release branch nixpkgs
💡 Result:
The nixpkgs release branch for NixOS 25.11 is named release-25.11 (channels are published as nixos-25.11 / nixpkgs-25.11). [1][2][3]
Sources:
- NixOS blog announcement (25.11 “Xantusia”). [1]
- Nixpkgs release/branch discussion and release schedule on GitHub (release-25.11). [2]
- NixOS wiki (channel branches: e.g. nixos-25.11). [3]
Use the correct branch name: release-25.11 instead of nixos-25.11.
The NixOS 25.11 release branch on GitHub is named release-25.11, not nixos-25.11. While nixos-25.11 is the published channel name, Flake inputs using github: URLs require the actual branch name. Update the URL to github:NixOS/nixpkgs/release-25.11.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @devenv.yaml around lines 6 - 7, The nixpkgs flake input uses the wrong
branch name; update the URL value under the nixpkgs-stable input so the GitHub
branch is release-25.11 instead of nixos-25.11 (i.e., change the URL string for
the nixpkgs-stable entry to github:NixOS/nixpkgs/release-25.11).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml:
- Around line 100-101: Update the workflow step that currently uses
actions/checkout@v3 and actions/setup-go@v3 to use actions/checkout@v5 and
actions/setup-go@v6 respectively, and add the go-version parameter to the
setup-go step (e.g., go-version: '1.20' or the project’s pinned Go version) so
the coverage job runs with the same Go version as go_tests and goreleaser_test.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: xenOs76
Repo: xenOs76/https-wrench PR: 16
File: devenv.nix:626-626
Timestamp: 2025-12-18T19:13:31.910Z
Learning: In the xenOs76/https-wrench repository's devenv.nix file, the `run-go-tests` command is intentionally excluded from the `enterTest` flow because Go unit tests are executed separately via GitHub Actions workflow (codeChecks.yml). This separation avoids redundancy, with devenv tests focusing on integration and CLI tests while GitHub Actions handles unit tests.
📚 Learning: 2025-12-18T19:13:31.910Z
Learnt from: xenOs76
Repo: xenOs76/https-wrench PR: 16
File: devenv.nix:626-626
Timestamp: 2025-12-18T19:13:31.910Z
Learning: In the xenOs76/https-wrench repository's devenv.nix file, the `run-go-tests` command is intentionally excluded from the `enterTest` flow because Go unit tests are executed separately via GitHub Actions workflow (codeChecks.yml). This separation avoids redundancy, with devenv tests focusing on integration and CLI tests while GitHub Actions handles unit tests.
Applied to files:
.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml
🪛 actionlint (1.7.10)
.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml
100-100: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
101-101: the runner of "actions/setup-go@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: goreleaser_test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml (1)
21-21: Go 1.25 is a valid stable release (released August 12, 2025). No concerns with the version specified in the workflow.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml (2)
96-111: Consider optimizing job dependencies and reducing test duplication.A few observations on the new coverage job:
Sequential dependency may be overly restrictive: This job depends on
goreleaser_test, but it only needs Go and source code. It could potentially run in parallel withdevenv_test(both depend ongo_testscompleting successfully).Tests run twice: The
go_testsjob already runsgo test -v ./..., and this job runs tests again with coverage flags. Consider either:
- Generating coverage in the existing
go_testsjob and uploading as an artifact, or- Removing the dependency chain if coverage check doesn't need goreleaser to pass first.
Missing step names: Lines 100-101 use actions without explicit
name:fields, unlike other jobs. Adding names improves workflow readability in the GitHub Actions UI.💡 Suggested improvement for step naming and potential parallel execution
go_test_coverage_check: - needs: goreleaser_test + needs: go_tests runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - - uses: actions/checkout@v5 - - uses: actions/setup-go@v6 + - name: Checkout + uses: actions/checkout@v5 + + - name: Setup Go + uses: actions/setup-go@v6 with: go-version: "1.25"
21-21: Go 1.25 is the current latest stable release (as of January 2026, released August 12, 2025), so the version specified is correct.The single-version matrix removes multi-version compatibility testing. If this is intentional, the matrix construct can remain for future expansion, but if multi-version testing is desired, consider adding additional Go versions.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: xenOs76
Repo: xenOs76/https-wrench PR: 16
File: devenv.nix:626-626
Timestamp: 2025-12-18T19:13:31.910Z
Learning: In the xenOs76/https-wrench repository's devenv.nix file, the `run-go-tests` command is intentionally excluded from the `enterTest` flow because Go unit tests are executed separately via GitHub Actions workflow (codeChecks.yml). This separation avoids redundancy, with devenv tests focusing on integration and CLI tests while GitHub Actions handles unit tests.
📚 Learning: 2025-12-18T19:13:31.910Z
Learnt from: xenOs76
Repo: xenOs76/https-wrench PR: 16
File: devenv.nix:626-626
Timestamp: 2025-12-18T19:13:31.910Z
Learning: In the xenOs76/https-wrench repository's devenv.nix file, the `run-go-tests` command is intentionally excluded from the `enterTest` flow because Go unit tests are executed separately via GitHub Actions workflow (codeChecks.yml). This separation avoids redundancy, with devenv tests focusing on integration and CLI tests while GitHub Actions handles unit tests.
Applied to files:
.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: devenv_test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml (1)
108-111: Coverage configuration file is properly configured.The
.testcoverage.ymlfile exists and is correctly set up with thresholds (file: 70%, package: 80%, total: 90%), matching thecover.outprofile generated by the coverage command.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml (1)
97-112: Consider optimizing job dependencies and avoiding duplicate test runs.Two observations:
Redundant test execution: Tests run twice—in
go_tests(line 40) and again here (line 107). Consider generating coverage ingo_testsand uploadingcover.outas an artifact for this job to consume.Sequential bottleneck: This job depends on
goreleaser_test, but coverage checking only needs the source code. Changing toneeds: go_testswould allow it to run in parallel withdevenv_testandgoreleaser_test, reducing total pipeline time.♻️ Suggested optimization
Option A: Run coverage check earlier in parallel:
go_test_coverage_check: - needs: goreleaser_test + needs: go_tests runs-on: ubuntu-latestOption B: Generate coverage once and share via artifacts (more involved but avoids duplicate test runs).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml.testcoverage.yml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .testcoverage.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-18T19:13:31.910Z
Learnt from: xenOs76
Repo: xenOs76/https-wrench PR: 16
File: devenv.nix:626-626
Timestamp: 2025-12-18T19:13:31.910Z
Learning: In the xenOs76/https-wrench repository's devenv.nix file, the `run-go-tests` command is intentionally excluded from the `enterTest` flow because Go unit tests are executed separately via GitHub Actions workflow (codeChecks.yml). This separation avoids redundancy, with devenv tests focusing on integration and CLI tests while GitHub Actions handles unit tests.
Applied to files:
.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: devenv_test
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/codeChecks.yml (3)
8-8: LGTM!Adding
.testcoverage.ymlto the trigger paths ensures CI runs when coverage thresholds are modified.
88-88: Consistent Go version usage.Same Go version as the matrix - ensure the version concern raised above is addressed here as well.
22-22: No action needed. Go 1.25 is a valid released version (August 2025) and is supported byactions/setup-go. The matrix configuration is correct.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Tests
Chores
Style
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.