feat(26.04): minimal fix of systemd#916
Merged
lczyk merged 5 commits intocanonical:ubuntu-26.04from Feb 19, 2026
Merged
Conversation
3 tasks
Test CoverageAverage Total Coverage: 76.19% Arch: aarch64Coverage: 76.19%
|
3 tasks
Collaborator
Author
|
adding 'priority' since a blocker for |
systemd
alesancor1
approved these changes
Feb 19, 2026
Member
alesancor1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, mostly deleted contents that are not there anymore 👍
Collaborator
Author
|
ready to merge with only one approval since 26.04 is still in devel, and this PR does not introduce any new slices / files. will wait for CI to finish, so just marking it as |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
this is a minimal fix of missing files in
systemdto unblock libnode.systemdwill still need a bunch of work, already PRed in #878#878 will be able to easily rebase on top of this PR
Related issues/PRs
Forward porting
n/a
Checklist